Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Fixing Harper - Part 2 - Electoral Reform

The first thing the new government can do along this line is scrap the Harper Conservatives' "Fair Elections Act".  There was nothing fair about it.  In fact, it deliberately attempted to disenfranchise as many people as possible and removed investigative powers from Elections Canada.  If we want fair elections, a good first step would be to move in exactly the opposite direction.

The second step would be to bring in a new system of voting in federal elections.  Let's start with this:



The main thrust of many groups is towards some form of Proportional Representation.  Some of those groups are:


Talk of a new system has already started.  
So what are some of the differences between the various options?

Mixed Member Proportional (MMP)

This system can be easily understood by watching this short video


Dual Member Mixed Proportional (DMP or DMMP)

This is another variant of proportional representation that was developed from a political scientist from Alberta.  It claims to avoid some of the concerns with the other forms of PR.

A good, short explanation can be seen here.  Note that the example is based on an election in PEI, but the same strategy could be used nationally.

Single Transferable Vote (STV)

This was the system recommended in British Columbia a few years ago and which was actually voted on in a referendum.  In fact, it's often referred to as BC-STV.

An explanation can be found in Wikipedia about the system.

This short animation helps to explain how it works.

The Citizens Assembly on Electoral Reform in BC still has much information on it's website and a good animation to explain how the system is supposed to work.

The P3 System

A good YouTube video explains how this system would work.

There have been quite a few articles in the media about electoral reform.

General articles such as this one in the G&M about reform in principle.

Articles about whether a referendum should be held, or not, ,such as this one in The Tyee.

Rural Urban Proportional

Fair Vote Canada has come out with a "hybrid" system which could deal with the rural-urban divide that we have in Canada.  It's called Rural-Urban Proportional (or STV+).  It combines aspects of MMP and STV.




Monday, October 26, 2015

Fixing Harper - Part 1 - The Long-Form Census

With the defeat of the Harper Conservatives on October 19th, the rebuilding of Canada can begin.  Here begins a series of posts that will look at what could, should or might be done to reverse the worst of the decisions made during the past 10 years.




The website heaveharper.ca is still active and outlines what it sees as the damage done to Canada and it's institutions.

The Facebook page called 78 Days, 78 Reasons lists the long-form census as Reason # 6 for dumping the Harper Conservatives.



One of the oft-mentioned dumb things that the Harper Conservatives did, announced in 2010, was to end of the mandatory long-form census.  A  bit of history about the census in general can be found here.  This was, according to the Conservatives, to put an end to the terrible intrusion into people's private lives, despite the clearly evident fact that there had been very, very few complaints about the survey and, so far as I know, no prosecutions for non-compliance.


The Liberals even set up an on-line petition to ask the government of the day to bring it back.  In the end, it seemed easier to just defeat the Conservatives and get on with the job.

Back in February of 2015, Macleans published an article that disagreed with the Chief Statistician's assertion that the voluntary survey was just fine.

The voices against this clearly ideological move were many and varied.  Examples here, and here.... among many, many others.

The elimination of the census, of course, was only part of the damage done, which extended to budget cuts and other dismantling of information sources that government and industry used.

Despite the nay-sayers, there is plenty of enthusiasm for the return of the long-form census.

In response to these nay-sayers, someone posted the following comment:
"Just amazing how so many people seem to think the census is intolerably intrusive but are OK with Harper's far more intrusive bill C-51, which grants unprecedented and excessive powers to government departments and agencies, opening the door to collecting, analyzing and potentially keeping forever the personal information of all Canadians, including every instant of a person’s tax information and details about a person’s business and vacation travel. All with no oversight from Parliament so CSIS or the PMO can use the info any way they want. 
You like the idea of CSIS or Justin Trudeau having a gander at your tax info, your travel, your internet browsing history? If so, you can thank Stephen Harper."

It appears that the long form census will be coming back, hopefully in time for the 2016 census.  A good early step.



Analyzing the Harper Defeat

Since the defeat of the Harper Conservatives on October 19th, there has been plenty of "analysis" floating around to explain exactly what went wrong.

ThinkPol just today posted an article discussing why Lynton Crosby's wedge issue "dog-whistle politics" didn't seem to work here in Canada.  Their main conclusion?

  "On October 19, the good people of Canada did something to prevent evil from triumphing. They voted."

Then, of course there were the expected comments from some of the very same journalists who, mere days before, were endorsing either the Conservatives without Harper, or with him, or a hope that he might leave if we voted for him, or who knows.  Their comments can be summarized like this: 


Andrew Coyne opined that everything Harper were not outgrowths of conservatism.  Dawg's Blog begged to differ.

Was it, as this article suggests, because Harper surrounded himself with people who wouldn't stand up to him.  Interestingly, I understand this article was originally posted, then removed and is now available only from an archive copy.  Who knows?

The election seems to have exposed a less tolerant underbelly of Canadian attitudes, as this article from HufPo suggests.  The niqab issue would seem to highlight that point, as did some people's response to the Syrian refugee crisis.  The Tyee also weighed in on this unhappy side of some of us.

It could be something in the Canadian psyche that caused us to respond to Harper's "fear and loathing" campaign tactics the way we did, as discussed here.

The NDP lost in a big way.  This could be explained by voters swarming to the Liberals, seeing them as the best bet to defeat the Conservatives, or it could be the change in direction of the NDP that people disliked.  The NDP, then, also has some self-analysis to go through, as discussed here.



These were at least some of the things that could explain what happened on October 19th.  No doubt some of them are closer to the truth than others.  I may post a few more in the coming days, but the reality is that, as a bumper sticker I saw some years ago put it: "End of an Error".  It's over and it's time to move on.  That's what coming posts will address.


Importing Harper's Tactics in BC

The news here in BC over the past week has been all a-twitter over how the Clark government (Liberal in name but Conservative in policy and actions) has been "managing" government e-mails.  The law says that they are supposed to save these things, as part of the record of how governments make decisions.  In some cases, assistants have been "triple deleting" e-mails, all of them, so that NO records remain.

The CBC has this story about "delete, delete, delete".  Accountability?  Not so much.

One government worker is being investigated after the Information Commissioner discovered him lying repeatedly under oath.

The full report Access Denied: Record Retention and Disposal Practices of the Government of BC can be read here.

Obviously getting rid of the Harper Conservatives was only the first step of the process....


A Weight Lifted

So, here we are.  A week after Election Day.  Pollsters and other prognosticators were predicting a close race.  It wasn't.  Starting with a clean sweep of all 32 Atlantic Canada seats, Liberals went on to win 184 seats, sealing their majority government for the next 4+ years.



The electoral map changed quite markedly, as shown in a useful graphic from the following article in the Huffington Post.

The post-election analysis has been in full swing and I'll talk about some of that in a later post.

For now, though, I'm just happy, as many, many Canadians are, that this decade is over.  Repairing the damage to Canada's international image, it's democratic institutions, scientific research facilities, environmental awareness, electoral fairness and many other things on a very long list will take time.  Perhaps this would be a fast-track solution:





Thursday, October 15, 2015

The Harper Record - One (More) Blogger's Compilation

These are from a post by Andrew Aulenback that I came across the other day.

I have been asked recently by some of my Conservative-Party-Loyal friends why I would ever support someone other than Stephen Harper as Prime Minister. "What has he done that every other politician hasn't?" I am asked. Well, in the interest of keeping my promise, here is a short list. I apologize for the obviously partisan [well, not party-loyal to any party, but the focused on what Stephen Harper has done to dissuade me from his consideration] nature of the post:

* Stephen Harper Found in Contempt of Parliament

For refusing to disclose information on the costing of programs to Parliament, which Parliament was entitled to receive, the Harper government became the first in Canadian history to be found in contempt of Parliament. This alone is a big deal. Even the Speaker of the House found it indefensible.

* Against Court Order, Refusal to Share Budget Info

Even though it lost a court case and was ordered to comply, the Harper government nevertheless still refused to share 170 times reasons and impacts for cuts with Canada's independent budget watchdog, mocking Parliament's right to control the public purse.

* Conservative Cabinet Staffers Granted Immunity from Testimony

A PMO edict absolved, or claimed to absolve, political staffers from ever having to testify before parliamentary committees.

* Conservatives Falsify Reports and Documents

Among documents deliberately altered in the writing or the quoting by the government: CIDA document by Bev Oda's office on Kairos; the Senate Committee Report on the Duffy affair; a report by former auditor general Sheila Fraser on financial management.

* Repeated Duplicity in Afghan Detainees Controversy

Among the abuses: Parliament was misled and denied documents. An inquiry was shut down. CPC MPs attempted to discredit diplomat Richard Colvin whose testimony diverted from the government's line of denial.

* Repeated Duplicity on Costing of F-35 Fighter Jets

An auditor general's report revealed serial deceptive practices used by the Conservatives in misleading both the public and especially Parliament on the projected cost of the fighter jets. Additionally, after the government agreed to review the purchase, perhaps even open it up to competitive bidding, the committee chosen by the Harper Government reported (18 months later) that the review will recommend buying the same plane, on the same terms — without competition.

* CPC Minister Lies, Blames Statistics Canada for Killing Long Form Census

Under fire for Conservatives killing the long form census, Industry Minister Tony Clement falsely stated that StatsCan backed the idea and assured the voluntary substitute would yield valid statistical data. Neither was true, outraged StatsCan sources confirmed, such that the head of StatsCan publicly refuted the lies about his statements and support, stepping down in protest as well.

* Conservative MP Lies to Parliament, Later Admits He Lied to Parliament

As opposition members claimed the Harper government was out to rig election rules in its favour, Conservative MP Brad Butt rose in the House of Commons to say why the bill was needed -- all the voter fraud he had personally witnessed in Nova Scotia. Weeks later he rose again to say his statements had been entirely false. Delivering his strained apology, he failed to explain why he lied in the first place.

* Conservative House Leader Admits to Mockery of Question Period

Criticized far and wide for farcical answers in question period, Paul Calandra, parliamentary secretary to Harper, made a tearful apology for abuse of the democratic process, in this case for having pretended to repeatedly hear "Iraq" as "Israel." He continued to fail to answer questions by instead giving spurious and "comedic" answers, however, as time went on.

* Harper Maligns the Supreme Court Chief Justice

The Prime Minister took the unprecedented step of alleging inappropriate conduct by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin. Facts undermined the credibility of the PM's position.

* Conservatives Engage in Abuse of Process with Omnibus Bills

Harper's party pushed legislation through Parliament via omnibus bills, the scale of which Parliament had never seen. Such bills are widely condemned as an abuse of the democratic process, because they blend and bury so many controversial laws within one dense package. Harper himself once railed against them, and his born again love for them made his own MPs queasy. Referencing such bills, former auditor general Sheila Fraser said that "Parliament has become so undermined that it is almost unable to do the job that people expect of it."

* Harperites Deliberately Sabotage, Stymie Committee System

Conservatives used tactics such as barring witnesses, closure, time limitations, and in camera sessions to an extent rarely, if ever, witnessed in Canada. In their early days in power, top Conservatives prepared a handbook instructing committee chairpersons how to obstruct proceedings.

* Harper's Own CPC MPs Protest Muzzling

In a caucus known for his tight discipline, in 2014 some members finally rose up to contest being censored at question period by the Prime Minister's Office. Former Conservative backbencher Brent Rathgeber turned independent and published a book, Irresponsible Government, decrying anti-democratic practices.

* Conservative Bill Back-Dates Bill To Before Bill Was Enacted to Protect Mounties from Potential Criminal Charges Against Access To Information Violation

To protect the RCMP's acceding to demands from the PMO to illegally destroy records early, the government made an old bill come retroactively into force before it had actually been passed by Parliament.

* Harper Minister Caught in Advertising Scam with Public Funds

The Globe and Mail revealed that Harper's chosen Minister for Democratic Reform Pierre Poilievre commissioned a team of public servants for overtime work on a Sunday to film him glad-handing constituents. The vanity video on the taxpayer dime was to promote the government's benefits for families.

* Access to Information System Impeded

Many new roadblocks have been put up by the Harper Conservatives. Former Information Commissioner Robert Marleau concluded that having obtained absolute power, the prime minister "has absolutely abused that power to the maximum."

* The Silencing of the Public Service

The PMO took an unprecedented step in instituting a system wherein the bureaucracy has all its communications vetted by the political nerve centre. The policy contribution role of the public service is significantly reduced. Complaints from insiders allege that the Privy Council office has become increasingly politicized. In particular, science and scientists have been controlled and impeded in their communications, especially but not exclusively in preventing information on climate change.

* Loyalty Oaths Imposed on Public Servants

Archivists and librarians were made to swear strict oaths of allegiance and were hit with restrictions on freedom of speech that editorialists of the right and left described as chilling, as they are not being applied to the crown or the nation, but to the party and politicians in power, and are expected to apply 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

* Harper Government Sued by Justice Department Whistleblower

Time and again the Harper government propose bills that end up being shot down by the courts, prompting critics to say such legislation is more about making political statements than lasting policy. The wasted efforts bothered senior justice department lawyer Edgar Schmidt so much he finally sued the government for breaking the law by inadequately evaluating whether proposed bills violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He was promptly suspended without pay.

* Conservatives Block Accreditation for Opposition MPs

In another example of partisanship taken to new heights, the PMO blocked opposition members from being accredited for international environment conferences and from visiting military bases.

* Clampdown on Freedom of Speech of Diplomatic Corps

Ottawa's diplomats must get all communications approved from Conservative political operatives. Under Harper, the country's ambassadors are hardly heard from any more. In a recent speech, former United Nations ambassador Stephen Lewis said our political culture under the Conservatives has descended into "a nadir of indignity."

* Marine Science Libraries Decimated

The Harper government's downsizing of federal libraries included sudden closing of seven world famous Department of Fisheries and Oceans archives. A leaked memo revealed the destruction and consolidation would save less than half a million dollars. Scientist patrons of the libraries, who witnessed chaotic chucking of rare literature, called it a "book burning" with no logical purpose other than to restrict environmental information. The Harper government claimed vital works would be digitally preserved, but never provided a plan or cost for doing so, nor any proof it had happened. No scientists interviewed by The Tyee believed digitizing would or could replace what was lost.

* Harper Government Denies Khadr Basic Rights

Defying court rulings, the Conservative government refused to accord Omar Khadr basic rights such as access to media. Editorialists of right and left persuasion described the move as unbefitting a democratic government.

* Illegitimate Prorogation of Parliament, Twice

Prorogations are a legitimate procedure that can be abused depending on motivations. The Harper government provoked 60 protests across Canada and beyond its borders in 2010 after shutting the legislature's doors to escape condemnation on the Afghan detainees' file. It was the second prorogation in a year's period.

* Undue Interference with Independent Agencies

Command and control system was extended to meddling in bodies like National Energy Board and CRTC whose arms-length autonomy is significantly reduced. A special target was the Parliamentary Budget Office, which was hit with condemnations and budget cuts for its critical reports.

* Billions Borrowed without Parliament's Permission

The auditor general sounded alarms about the "prodigious" growth and size of federal borrowing. Those billions in "non-budgetary" spending used to get Parliament's oversight, but no more. The finance minister can borrow what he wants without Parliament's permission. Why? A loophole buried in a 2007 Harper omnibus bill.

* Lapdogs Appointed as Watchdogs

The most controversial was the case of former Integrity Commissioner Christiane Ouimet. Her office reviewed more than 200 whistleblowing cases. Disciplinary action followed on none of them. Ouimet's own angry staffers blew the whistle on their boss. The auditor general foundOuimet intimidated her employees, took "retaliatory action" against them and may have breached their privacy, all part of the Harper appointee's "gross mismanagement." Ouimet was paid more than $500,000 to leave her post.

* The 'Harper Government' Labelling Deception

Public servants were told to use "Harper Government" instead of "Government of Canada" in publicity releases. The Conservatives denied it was happening -- until internal memos revealed by the Canadian Press revealed the denial to be without basis.

* Conservatives Place Party Logos on Government of Canada Cheques

Once "caught red-handed," they backed off. The federal ethics commissioner, adopting the exasperated tone of an adult lecturing a child, noted: "Public spending announcements are government activities, not partisan political activities, and it is not appropriate to brand them with partisan or personal identifiers."

* Record Amounts of Partisan Political Advertising, on the Public Purse

Several media reports told how the Conservatives used taxpayer money for partisan political advertising in record quantity, costing the public treasury $750 million since Harper became PM. In one instance, the Tories spent lavishly on ads for the promotion of a jobs grant program that had yet to be made public or presented to parliament or the provinces. Even more nakedly partisan, a mailed blast, charged to the taxpayers, targeting Justin Trudeau.

* Government Muzzles Science Community

Top scientists came under such heavy monitoring by the Conservatives that they staged "Death of Evidence" protests for being denied freedom of speech. The Conservatives sent out chaperones or "media minders" to track Environment Canada scientists and report on them. Continued and repeated silencing of scientists and scientific dialogue continues.

* Like Never Before, Limits Placed on Media Access

Journalists have been hard-pressed to recall another time when controls put on them were so tight. At the Conservatives' 2013 Calgary convention, reporters wrote of being harassed and penned in at every turn by the PMO's command and control system. In his book Killing The Messenger, journalist Mark Bourrie charts the many examples of new limits on freedom of speech introduced in the Harper era.

* Harper's Team Tries to Ban Journalist for Asking Question

Veteran TV cameraman Dave Ellis covered a Harper speech about oil to a business audience. Though media had been instructed no questions allowed, Ellis posed one about charges laid against a Conservative MP. The PMO tried to punish Ellis and his network by kicking him off covering Harper's trip to Malaysia. After media hue and cry, Harper backed down and Ellis went.

* Suppression of Research

In the gun registration debate, incriminating research and documents such as a Firearms Report were deliberately withheld from the public. While ramping up their prison building, Conservatives suppressed related research and studies contradicting their political priorities.

* Protesters Put under Blanket Surveillance

According to a leaked memo, as part of its command and control approach, the Conservatives have approved a system wherein all advocates, protesters and demonstrations can be monitoredby authorities. The Government Operations Centre has requested federal departments to assist it in compiling a comprehensive inventory of protesters. Security specialists have called it a breach of Canadians' Charter of Rights. Conservatives have moved to give CSIS even more powers than the spy agency wants.

* Rights and Democracy, Other Groups, Dismantled

In a show of brute force, the Montreal-based group Rights and Democracy was pole-axed for its alleged political leanings and eventually disbanded. Organizations like the church group Kairoswere de-budgeted or dismantled for political leanings. Nuclear Safety Commission head Linda Keen was dumped. Among the complaints cited by the PM was that in her distant past, she had some Liberal ties.

* Harper Government Spied on Aboriginal Critic, 'Retaliated'

Aboriginal child welfare advocate Cindy Blackstock was spied on by the Harper government, and when she arrived for a meeting with other First Nations leaders at the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs only she was barred entry. Finding Blackstock had been "retaliated" against by a ministry official, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal awarded her $20,000 for pain and suffering.

* Revenue Canada Targeted to Attack Charities

Not all charities, just the ones that don't seem adequately aligned with the Harper brand. Enough to include many environmental, aid, human rights and free speech charities that banded together to push back against what looks like a politically motivated witch hunt. When an investigation into whether there was PMO coercion became possible, Revenue Canada instructed all staff to destroy all text message records, against standard procedures.

* Conservatives Use Unheard of Tactic to Force through Anti-Union Bill

Conservative senators went to the unprecedented extent of overruling their own Speaker. What could be so important to break Senate rules? A bill pushed by Harper that is almost certainly unconstitutional for its privacy invading measures forced onto unions, unlike other groups. Latest in a steady stream of Conservative attacks on organized labour in Canada.

* Harper Smears Liberal Sikh MP, Insinuating Tie to Terrorism

When Liberals opposed a 2007 Conservative plan to extend anti-terror legislation, Stephen Harper singled out Grit MP Navdeep Bains, seeming to suggest that Bains' party was motivated by a desire to protect Bains' father-in-law, Darshan Singh Saini. A recent news story had claimed Singh Saini was on a list of witnesses sought by the RCMP for its Air India investigation, but provided no proof he was involved. In the House, Liberals erupted with outrage and Bains asked, in vain, that Harper apologize.

* Veterans' Advocates Smeared

Medical files of Sean Bruyea, a strong advocate for veterans' rights, were leaked in a case that privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddart described as "alarming." Veterans Affairs Canada ombudsman Pat Stogran was dumped after criticizing the government.

* Conservative Convicted on Robocalls Scam

Tory operative Michael Sona was given jail time for his role in the robocalls scam. The judge indicated more than one person was likely involved. In another court judgment in a case brought by the Council of Canadians, the ruling said the robocalls operation was widespread, not just limited to the Guelph riding. Donald Segretti who did dirty tricks for the Nixon White House told a Canadian reporter his skullduggery didn't go so low as to run schemes sending voters to the wrong polling stations.

* Harper's Ex-Parliamentary Secretary Jailed for Breaking Election Law

Dean Del Maestro was one of Harper's favourites. As his parliamentary secretary, the PM frequently used him as an attack dog to allege misdeeds by opposition members. Del Maestro was given a jail sentence in June for his own election spending violations, which is to say, cheating.

* 'Reprehensible' Dirty Tricks Campaign against Irwin Cotler

Conservative Commons Speaker Andrew Scheer ruled his party's own tactics in running a surreptitious misinformation campaign in the riding of the highly respected MP were "reprehensible.


* Election Violations Prompt Resignation of Cabinet Member

Peter Penashue, another Harper Conservative was compelled to step down over election spending violations.

* Harper's Office Deploys Interns for Dirty Tricks

In one instance that brought on allegations of Nixonian tactics, junior PMO staffers in the guise of normal citizens were sent out to disrupt a Justin Trudeau speech.

* Citizens Ejected from Conservative Rallies

Tory operatives hauled out citizens from a Harper rally in the 2011 campaign because they had marginal ties to other parties. A spokesperson for the PM was compelled to apologize. Problem fixed this time around: Only fully vetted Harper supporters will be allowed, by invite only, to attend the PM's campaign stops. If they have a ticket.

* Conservatives Make Campaign Event Attendees Sign Gag Order

Not only have Harper's campaign handlers made his campaign events by invite only, they are forcing anyone let in to sign an agreement not to transmit any description of the event or any images from it.

* Conservatives Unfix Their Own Fixed Date Election Law

In 2008, Harper pulled the plug on his own government, violating his own new law, which stipulated elections every four years
.
* Guilty Plea on In and Out Affair

The Conservative Party and its fundraising arm pled guilty to some Elections Act charges stemming from their exceeding spending limits in the 2006 campaign. The investigation cost taxpayers over $2 million.

* CPC Elections Bill Strips Power from Elections Canada

The Fair Elections Act also makes it harder for Canadians to vote as more ID is required. Nationwide protests in which more than 400 academics took part forced Pierre Poilievre to withdraw some measures in the bill because of their alleged anti-democratic bent.

* Harper Minister Smears Head of Elections Canada

In a bid to impugn his integrity, Democratic Reform Minister Pierre Poilievre accused the Elections Canada CEO Marc Mayrand of being a power monger and wearing a team jersey.

* Copyright Grab for Attack Ads

CTV News found out Conservatives aimed to rewrite copyright law to let political parties grab any media content and use it for free in their ads. The impact, warned CTV's Don Martin, "will be to cast a chill on every broadcast appearance" by MPs, commentators and reporters, who "must now be aware their views could end up featured in a political attack ad." By asserting "unlimited access to the airwaves for propaganda purposes," Martin said, the Harper government "could be seen as flirting with fascism."

* Conservatives Use Terrorists' Propaganda in Attack Ad Immediately After Making That Illegal

Harper's party created a political ad incorporating music and horrifying images of doomed captives pulled straight from the Islamic State's own promotional video. The target: Justin Trudeau, whose views on the risks and rewards of bombing ISIS differ from Harper's. This immediately after making it illegal to spread terrorists' propaganda even incidentally or accidentally.

* Canada Is The Only UN Member To Reject Landmark Indigenous Rights Document

CPC aboriginal affairs deputy minister Colleen Swords represented Ottawa at the United Nations assembly in New York, where Canada was the only nation to object to a non-legally binding UN outcome document which promotes indigenous peoples' legal and political standing and participation in their various home countries. This after UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples found in the UN's 2014 report that Canada's relationship as a nation with its indigenous peoples continues to be an antagonistic rather than cooperative one.

* Prime Minister's Office Charged in Court By Information Commissioner

Canadian Press submitted Access to Information request identified 28 pages of documents available, according to the Privy Council Office, but the PMO refused to allow access to 27 of the 28 pages, despite being legally obliged. The case has gone to federal court.

* Conservative Party's Lawyers Declare No Responsibility Between Government And Combat Veterans.

In response to a lawsuit by Canadian combat veterans over the new Veterns Charter, wherein the veterans stated "The social covenant is this promise that our country, Canada, has promised service people they will be protected when they get maimed and their families will be looked after if they are killed," the federal government responded that "At no time in Canada's history has any alleged 'social contract' or 'social covenant' having the attributes pleaded by the plaintiffs been given effect in any statute, regulation or as a constitutional principle written or unwritten." That the government has no obligation to care for wounded combat veterans. The lawsuit has been put on pause during the election, and will resume afterward.

* Department of Foreign Affairs Instructed To Meet Quota Of Terror

The Prime Minister's Office instructed the Department of Foreign Affairs in April of 2015, with an election looming, to ensure a minimum of three Terrorism Warning media releases each week. The bureaucrats of the Department declined to meet the "odd" demand for a quota,
--
These are a number of things which help Stephen Harper and, through the "Harper" brand, the Conservative Party of Canada, stand out from other politicians and other parties current and historic.
David Beers has a more extensive listing of this list and more, over at The Tyee. His version of this list breaks 70 items. I am evidently more conservative than that, and consider mis-spending and pork-barrel scandals to be similar enough to previous governments to not be worth listing.




No Free Lunch

While I'm sympathetic with people concerned about taxes and government spending, there are a few facts Harper is hoping you will overlook. 
There is NO free lunch. If the government lowers taxes in one area or offers you a boutique tax credit, something else will have to be cut or other charges (taxes) will need to be increased. Try to figure out where the money is coming from to pay for all of these:
  • Buying votes with an ill-advised GST cut that has put Canada into a structural deficit. Cost: $25 BILLION PER YEAR in lost federal revenues
  • Legal fees for the Con party: $482 million and counting
  • Government advertising for one year: $136.3 million
  • Tar sands and other fossil fuel subsidies: $1.4 billion
  • Advertising tar sands: $9 million for one year
  • Gazebos and toilets for Tony Clement's riding: $50 million
  • Advertising war of 1812 and world wars: $40 million plus planned $27.5 million per year until 2020 for war commemoration
  • G8/G20 photo ops: $1.2 billion
  • Yearly personal security for the prime minister- comes with a handy closet: $20 million+
  • Robocalls: it’s before the courts (still)
  • Senator’s expenses during Con party fundraising tours (who knows?)
  • They don’t know: $3.1 billion (money that just "disappeared")
  • Prisons: $16 billion - double spending by 2015 (an increase of $5 billion annually)
  • Media & communications staffers: $263 million
  • Court costs to fight disabled veterans: $750,000 and rising
  • Accommodation for DND and CSEC to buy the Nortel building: $1 billion +
  • Shipping armoured cars to India for Harper to NOT meet the PM: $1 million
  • Iraq war: $166 million
  • Panda rental $10 million

And just remember, this is the government that canceled the Home Insulation Program, which would have reduced home heating bills, and replaced it with the Home Renovation Program, which means we all get to subsidize someone's new deck.
I think it's great when voters get concerned about government spending.  Just make sure you're in possession of all the facts.




Saturday, October 10, 2015

One Angry Canadian

Look. In the past few weeks I've seen more crap than I ever thought possible. On Facebook, if you can believe it. Or perhaps that explains it. I'm not sure.

Whatever, I've decided is that in this Information Age, far too many people are completely and perhaps willfully uninformed. Also gullible. Not to mention prejudiced. Maybe bigoted.

I've seen doctored Ontario drivers licenses with a burka-covered person pictured. 



A minute or so wandering around the Interweb revealed the original image on the Ontario Government's website - a John Doe, it seems. Have people never heard of Photoshop?



I've seen claims that refugees are getting tons of cash.



A FederalGovernment website actually mentions those claims and shows exactly what refugees DO get.  An article in The Tyee also covers the "issue".

Some people seem to think that anyone in a niqab can walk into a passport office (drivers licensing office, etc) and get an ID photo taken just the way they are. Every province (I checked 3, just to be sure) has clear requirements about what is acceptable in these photos. And no, you can't wear your ski mask, niqab, goggles, glasses, face scarf.... Honestly. How dumb can some people be?

How many people just believe any crap they see or hear? What happened to skepticism? I mean, 97% of climate scientists say that humans are the main cause of climate change and immediately we have all sorts of doubting Thomases popping up saying: “Nah, they can't be right. They're making it up. I'm just not convinced.” Some of them are actually running as Conservative candidates in this election (Okanagan NorthShuswap).

But you show them a picture of a drivers license with someone wearing a niqab and they're outraged. HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN IN CANADA, they say? It's against our traditions and values.

Someone needs to teach these clods about Google.

Canada actually doesn't have a really good record on things like this, you know. We refused entry to Jews fleeing Nazi Germany (one immigration official was quoted as saying “none is too many”). We turned away Sikhs fleeing the Indian sub-continent (the people some a$$holes call “ragheads”). The Conservative government of the day AND the National Citizen's Coalition (an organization Mr Harper belonged to at the time) fought the introduction of the turban in the RCMP a couple of decades ago. They lost that legal battle, just like they're losing now, and yet the sky hasn't fallen and I'll bet none of you have been pulled over by an RCMP member wearing a turban. And so what if you were?

So, that's where we are in 2015. All the important things that we could be discussing like adults. Things that really matter to this country and it's citizens.  Health care, the economy, prisons, Senate reform, electoral change, education, our military, our veterans, child poverty, homelessness.....

And what we're spending our time doing is listening to a vocal number bleat on about “Canadian values and traditions”, the niqab, how they're "fighting against misogyny” blah, blah, blah.

Maybe Canada doesn't really deserve a Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Maybe we don’t deserve to live in a pseudo-democracy. Let's see if I'm right on October 19th.


[This rant approved by one really annoyed Canadian who is really tired of all this Bullsh*t]