Monday, March 31, 2025

The Conservatives Fall From Grace?

Dissecting the Conservatives' fall from grace. 

Two months ago, the Conservatives seemed destined to romp to a majority government.  Now, the Liberals have taken the lead.  This article examines some of the possible reasons.

This article was posted on Facebook on March 31st, 2025, by Sean Prpick, a freelance journalist based in Regina.  It was written by Susan Delacourt and published in the Toronto Star.  I'm posting it here in its entirety for the record.  I've highlighted a few sections that I found especially interesting.




The Toronto Star’s Susan Delacourt today on why Pierre Poilievre’s chippy, attack dog personality is making it very difficult for him to shift gears in the federal election campaign.
****
Pierre Poilievre’s big problem as Conservatives slide in the polls? He can’t turn his enemies into friends
Pressure is building for the leader and his team to shift their entire approach to this campaign, writes Susan Delacourt.
March 31, 2025
Pierre Poilievre went into this election campaign with plenty of political skills, but lacking one he needs right now — the ability to turn enemies into friends.
That could be a tall order for this take-no-prisoners Conservative leader.
As each day brings a new report of unrest within the Conservative team, pressure is building for the leader and his team to shift their entire approach to this campaign. The consensus seems to be that they’re fighting like it’s 2024, but this is 2025, and the Donald Trump reality has to be tackled head on.
But it’s not just that. It is increasingly clear that Poilievre was prepared to fight a front-runner’s campaign, cruising to a majority and simply put, that’s not the bright future before Conservatives right now.
The latest projections by the Star’s Signal poll tracker put Mark Carney and the Liberals on course to win a decisive majority, around 190 seats — well above the 172 seats needed — while the Conservatives would win between 123 to 139 seats.
When you’re a front-runner, as Poilievre once was, you don’t have to worry so much about all the enemies you’ve accumulated along the way, whether that was Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservatives, the other opposition parties or even the traditional media.
Poilievre has done next to zero outreach with any of those interests in advance of the election campaign, presumably because he and his team didn’t think they would need them. They may be learning to regret that now.
The Star’s Queen’s Park bureau reported that Poilievre and Ford finally did have a conversation just before the campaign launched but it didn’t go all that well. And then came the startling shot this week from Ford’s top adviser, Kory Teneycke, saying the Poilievre campaign was off the rails and the leader himself “too Trumpy.”
This is not what Poilievre needed, to say the least, and it seems to have emboldened a subsequent series of Conservatives to start venting in the media about how the leader and his chief adviser, Jenni Byrne, are not up to the task at hand.
Not so long ago, you wouldn’t have found Conservatives brave enough to say that out loud to the media, even anonymously. But maintaining discipline through fear and intimidation is more difficult when the leader is running from behind.
Worse, that kind of leadership can also be seen as “too Trumpy,” to borrow Teneycke’s phrase. Are Canadians looking for a prime minister who, like Trump, is a party of one, demanding nothing but obsequious silence from his own troops?
James Kanagasooriam, a U.K. pollster who worked on the Conservatives’ last campaign in 2021, put up some social-media posts over the weekend highlighting the peril of Poilievre getting linked too closely to Trump. He appears to think this is a big problem for the Conservatives at the moment.
“The ballot question is about Trump. Not being like a Trump is as important as criticizing him,” he wrote.
He also noted that the Canadian electorate is extremely fluid, which means “not being hated is critical.”
Poilievre, unlike his old boss, Stephen Harper, has done little to build any bridges to the Bloc Québécois or New Democrats since he became leader, perhaps assuming that he would have a majority and not need their help in a minority Parliament.
As things now stand — and it is early — that majority seems elusive, if not impossible. My colleague Mark Ramzy reported on Saturday how Poilievre seemed to be offering an olive brach to the Bloc by vowing not to challenge Quebec’s language laws, but on that same day, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh ruled out propping up a Conservative government. Perhaps two years of trashing his fellow opposition parties as dupes of the Liberals have reached a reckoning point for Poilievre.
Similarly, Poilievre and his team could be finding that their hostility to traditional media could be coming back to bite them. Keeping all media off the campaign plane, for instance, may have seemed like a good idea when the Conservatives thought they would romp to power without the bothersome journalists asking questions all the time and simply channel all their communication through friendly, right-wing outlets.
But having reporters aboard a campaign plane presents opportunities for advisers to give background and context; to see the leader away from the podium and the talking points. Poilievre hasn’t been taunting his media questioners as much on the campaign trail as he did in press encounters before the election.
Perhaps that is, again, an effort to distance himself from the media-baiter Trump, or just a sign that all-enemies-all-the-time doesn’t work when you’re fighting for the centre.
Conservatives suited up for this election to play an aggressive game of offence.
The polls so far show that a more defensive game is required; one that requires making fewer enemies, or even turning those enemies into friends.


Friday, March 28, 2025

Election 2025 Prognostications

 

Canada's Federal Election will be held on April 28th, 2025.

Until a couple of weeks ago, it seemed the Conservatives would win a majority.  Actions by the American administration have turned that on its head.

My plan is to update this blog twice.  Once around mid-April and again after the election results are in.

Polls vary widely, but indications at this point (March 28th) seem to indicate the Liberals winning a majority.  This article seems to be the most optimistic.  I haven't tried to find countering views.  As a former PM once said, "Dogs know what to do with poles".... (or polls, whatever).  So for what it's worth, this is one prognostication as of 2 days ago.

Read Canadian Poll Shocker for the full article.  Here is the very brief summary.

According to EKOS:

📊 Liberals: 50% popular support
🧌 Conservatives: 35%
🟠 NDP: 7%
🟢 Greens & Bloc: somewhere between “meh” and “microscopic”

Seat-wise? It’s an absolute obliteration:

🟥 Liberals: 251 seats
🟦 Conservatives: 90 seats
🟠 NDP: 12 seats
🟩 Bloc: 24
🌱 Greens: 1
🪦 Poilievre: zero charisma, zero seat, zero plan

Next update around mid-campaign.



 

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Bogus Part I

 

(From elsewhere on the Internet)

Trump's Lies About Canada Vs. Reality
Subsidies/Trade Deficit

Trump Lie: Trump said March 13: "In the case of Canada, we're spending $200 billion a year to subsidize Canada."
Reality: Trump has repeatedly exaggerated the U.S.-Canada trade deficit which is closer to $35.7 billion, according to the latest trade data released from the U.S. Census Bureau on March 6. The overwhelming driver of the deficit with Canada is that the U.S. buys a lot of unrefined oil from Canada. If you take out energy (that the USA desperately needs AND gets from us at a discount!), Canada is running a small deficit with the United States.
Dairy

Trump Lie: Trump said on March 7: "In Canada, we find that they're charging us over 200% for dairy products"
Reality: The over 200% tariffs on U.S. dairy products are only triggered if U.S. dairy exports exceed certain yearly duty-free limits, and U.S. dairy manufacturers say they have never been close to exceeding these limits. These tariffs were negotiated during the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which Mr. Trump signed during his first term.
Fentanyl

Trump Lie: March 4: "They have allowed fentanyl to come into our country at levels never seen before, killing hundreds of thousands of our citizens."
Reality: Trump cited Canada's failure to halt the flow of illicit drugs as a reason for imposing tariffs, saying that fentanyl has been coming from the country "at levels never seen before." He claimed, "The fentanyl coming through Canada is massive." In 2024, U.S. Customs and Border Patrol seized 43 pounds of fentanyl at the U.S.-Canada border, accounting for roughly 0.2% of all fentanyl seized by CBP that year. By contrast, approximately 21,100 pounds — about 96.6% of the total — was seized at U.S.-Mexico border.


Monday, March 24, 2025

Oh Alberta (reprise)

 

File this under the category of "What Was She Thinking"?

A Canadian Premier urging a foreign leader to adjust his policies just to avoid pissing off Canadians in the runup to an election?  

Dan Yell's supporters and advisors might try to spin this differently, but read what she apparently said.  


Yeah, it's Offensive, all right.

Alberta Premier's office denies Smith urged US to interfere in Federal election.

Anything that can legitimately show this in a better light?  This is what I read:

During a March 8 interview with Breitbart, a right-wing U.S. media company, Smith said the Conservative Party of Canada was far ahead of the governing Liberal Party in polls before the trade war. But the threat of "unjust and unfair tariffs" had boosted Liberal support.

Smith told U.S. administration officials that she hoped "we could put things on pause," so Canada could get through an election, she told Breitbart. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is more aligned with the Trump administration's agenda, Smith said.

"The longer this dispute goes on, politicians posture, and it seems to be benefiting the Liberals right now," Smith told Breitbart.

"Let's just put things on pause so we can get through an election," she said. "Let's have the best person at the table make the argument for how they would deal with it — and I think that's [Conservative Leader] Pierre Poilievre."

Explain how we should see this as anything other than an invitation to interfere in the election of a sovereign nation.


Friday, March 21, 2025

Whither Democracy

 

Events over the past few weeks in American politics has caused many people and some organizations to question what will become of Democracy in the USA.

US Could lose Democracy status, says global watchdog



Saturday, March 15, 2025

MAGA Man (A Neil Young Parody - Canada Ain't Your 51st State)

Making the rounds on social media, this takeoff from Neil Young.

Thursday, March 06, 2025

The Logic of Science - Masks and Vaccines

 

Masks and COVID vaccines were were huge successes; Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were not

This post from The Logic of Science

A good analysis of the way the world was, starting at the beginning of 2020.  Interestingly, and disturbingly, disinformation persists today, 5 years on.

Wednesday, March 05, 2025

As If We Didn't Know Already

 

Several million voters elected an eejit to the White House.

But we knew that already....




How Can You Tell When Trump is Lying?

 Apparently whenever he opens his mouth.  This analysis from subversives within the Federal bureaucracy.

stdernoSophlafh1h7g83a5381iff18628g606tia8g1hf91t2357u0i6800 

That speech didn’t age well. Here are some notes on the false and misleading claims.
“We won the popular vote by big numbers and won counties in our country 2,700 to 525.”
This is misleading. Trump won the popular vote in 2024 but only by a small margin (1.5%), one of the smallest in modern history.
“Illegal border crossings last month were by far the lowest ever recorded.”
False. February had about 8,300 border encounters, far from historic lows. In the early 1900s and 1960s, annual crossings were much lower.
“Hundreds of thousands of illegal crossings a month, and virtually all of them including murderers, drug dealers, gang members and people from mental institutions and insane asylums were released into our country.”
False. While crossings were high under Biden, there’s no evidence that most migrants were criminals or from institutions.
“I withdrew from the unfair Paris Climate accord, which was costing us trillions of dollars.”
False. The Paris Accord is nonbinding, and the U.S. set its own commitments. Trump’s cost estimates come from industry-backed studies that ignore benefits.
“We ended the last administration’s insane electric vehicle mandate, saving our autoworkers and companies from economic destruction.”
False. Biden promoted EV incentives, not a mandate. Automakers had already committed to EVs due to global trends.
“I have directed that for every one new regulation, 10 old regulations must be eliminated.”
False. No reliable metric shows Trump cut more regulations than past presidents. Studies found his claims exaggerated.
“We’ve ended weaponized government where, as an example, a sitting president is allowed to viciously prosecute his political opponent like me.”
False. No evidence Biden directed prosecutors against Trump.
“We inherited from the last administration an economic catastrophe and an inflation nightmare.”
False. Trump inherited low unemployment, falling inflation, and strong growth.
“We suffered the worst inflation in 48 years. But perhaps even in the history of our country, they’re not sure.”
False. Inflation peaked at 9% in 2022, lower than the 1970s and post-WWII spikes.
“Joe Biden especially let the price of eggs get out of control.”
Misleading. Egg prices spiked due to bird flu, not Biden’s policies.
“The appalling waste we have already identified … We found hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud.”
Unproven. Claims rely on questionable math, miscategorized spending, and false fraud allegations.
“…$45 million for diversity, equity and inclusion scholarships in Burma …”
False. The funding was for scholarships in Myanmar, not DEI programs.
“…$10 million for male circumcision in Mozambique …”
False. It was a public health initiative to reduce HIV/AIDS.
“…$20 million for the Arab Sesame Street in the Middle East. It’s a program. $20 million for a program …”
False. The main funding came from private foundations, not U.S. government grants.
“…$59 million for illegal alien hotel rooms in New York City …”
Misleading. NYC received a grant for migrant housing at standard, not luxury, rates.
“We have hundreds of thousands of federal workers who have not been showing up to work.”
False. Many federal employees telework, but Trump’s numbers are exaggerated.
“It was one of the main reasons why our tax cuts were so successful in our first term, giving us the most successful economy in the history of our country.”
False. The economy was strong, but not the best in history—other periods had higher growth and lower debt.
“Over the last three months about Mexico and Canada, but we have very large deficits with both of them. But even more important, they’ve allowed fentanyl to come into our country at levels never seen before.”
False. Mexico is the main source of fentanyl, not Canada.
“We pay subsidies to Canada and to Mexico of hundreds of billions of dollars.”
Misleading. Trade deficits aren’t subsidies, and Trump’s numbers are exaggerated.
“We have had $1.7 trillion of new investment in America in just the past few weeks.”
Dubious. Claims rely on recycled announcements, vague commitments, and unrelated Biden-era policies.
“Not long ago. And you can’t even believe these numbers. 1 in 10,000 children had autism. 1 in 10,000. and now it’s 1 in 36. There’s something wrong.”
Misleading. The rise is partly due to better diagnosis and broader definitions.
“But it was built at tremendous cost of American blood and treasure. 38,000 workers died building the Panama Canal.”
False. The actual number was under 6,000, mostly non-Americans.
“Europe has sadly spent more money buying Russian Oil and Gas than they have spent on defending Ukraine — by far!”
False. Military and humanitarian aid for Ukraine exceeded energy spending.
“We’ve spent perhaps $350 billion [on Ukraine], like taking candy from a baby. That’s what happened. And they’ve [the E.U.] spent $100 billion.”
False. U.S. aid was $183 billion, while the EU’s total support exceeded that.
“Biden has authorized more money in this fight than Europe has spent by billion and billions of dollars.”
Misleading. The EU has committed and spent more than the U.S., but disbursement rates differ

Tuesday, March 04, 2025

If Trump was President in 1940

Think back.  Think waaaay back.

Saturday, March 01, 2025

John Stewart on DOGE

 

The video is about 20 minutes long, but it's worth watching.

I understand that Musk has agreed to come on The Daily Show, if nothing is edited or censored.  This could be funny to watch.



OUTRAGEOUS

 

Yesterday's meeting between Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, DonOLD Trump and his sidekick JD, descended into what can only be described as a old-style Mafia shakedown.

Trump, Vance shout at Zelenskyy in Heated Oval Office Meeting.



This is simply outrageous.  Ukraine was invaded by Russia.  Ukraine has been trying to defend itself with cautious help from allies for 3 years.  One of those allies used to be the United States.  Not any more, apparently.

Under Trump and his boy JD, the USA seems to have abandoned democracies, has been heard repeating Pootin's talking points about who started this war (as if there was ANY doubt) and has been suggesting that if only Ukraine would settle with Russia, all would be good.

Aurel Braun, a professor of international relations and political science at the University of Toronto, said the exchange was "something extraordinary" that will only play well with a fraction of Trump's most ardent supporters.

"Many Americans will be appalled by this. Most Americans do not want to see this kind of public bullying and humiliation of some ally, which is fighting for its life," said Braun, who is also an associate at the Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies at Harvard University.

"I think this has very long historical implications, I think this is most unfortunate, and it is not over. Trump can change his mind in a New York minute, but what has happened today has been something that will darken whatever legacy [Trump] has forever."

 In another story, The Day the Old American Order Cracked in the Oval Office, there were these comments:

To find a precedent, one expert looked back to the defunct Soviet bloc, and how the Kremlin would treat subservient communist leaders.

"How they humiliated them in public. How they bullied them. There has been no precedent in the United States," said Aurel Braun, an expert on eastern Europe at the University of Toronto, calling the meeting "extraordinary."

Naturally, Russia was celebrating.

In Moscow, the celebratory posts online popped like champagne corks. Referring to Zelenskyy, former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev posted on X: "The insolent pig finally got a proper slap down in the Oval Office."

Once again, one has to ask.... is there a Russian Agent in the Oval Office? 

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Russian Agent in the Oval Office?

 

Pretty hard to believe, given the decades of anti-Soviet, Red-Scare crap that came out of the US, but the question is being asked, and recent comments from the main characters aren't very reassuring.


This all goes back quite a few years, close to 40, to be exact.  For example, The Guardian had this story, written in 2021.

'The perfect target": Russia cultivated Trump as an asset for 40 years - ex-KGB spy

During tЯump's first term as President, there was this exchange (Trump sides with Russia against FBI at Helsinki summit) 

"At a news conference after the summit, President tЯump was asked if he believed his own intelligence agencies or the Russian president when it came to the allegations of meddling in the elections.

"President Putin says it's not Russia. I don't see any reason why it would be," he replied.

US intelligence agencies concluded in 2016 that Russia was behind an effort to tip the scale of the US election against Hillary Clinton, with a state-authorised campaign of cyber attacks and fake news stories planted on social media."

tЯump has also parroted Russian nonsense about the war, claiming that Ukraine started it.

Even more recently (basically yesterday, in the United Nations) the US sided with Russia on two different resolutions.

US Sides with Russia in UN Resolutions on Ukraine

So the question has to be asked.... is there a Russian Agent in the Oval Office?

More to come, I'm sure.